FORGET TOXIC SHORTCUTS
An authored article of Manish Sabharwal and Sonal Arora in Business Standard talks about national Minimum Wage
A national Minimum wage will murder the formal job creation our youth need and corrodes competitive federalism
The Ministry of Labour is clearly more ignorant than the young boy at a job fair in Gwalior who told us “Give me a monthly salary of 4000 Rs in Gwalior, 6000 Rs in Gurgaon, 9000 Rs in Delhi, and 18,000 Rs in Mumbai; my bags are packed so tell me where you want me to go”. The proposal for National Minimum wages of Rs 18,000 is like Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Gurantee Act – a rigged benchmark – and will murder formal sector job creation by mandating wages not linked to cost-of living. This decision is even more horrifying because most entrepreneurs thought that lessons had been learnt from the extreme short-term policy making of the last government’s National Advisory Council that converted a high growth low inflation economy to a low growth high inflation economy. This government deservedly prides itself in taking intelligent policy risks (demonetization, bankruptcy code, and GST) while taking the long view (India’s problems means that a ten-year plan is not ten one-year plans). But there is nothing intelligent or long-term about a rigged national minimum wage; it is an unnecessary, diversionary and toxic shortcut by a Ministry that has massively underperformed on reducing the regulatory cholesterol for formal job creation.
More dangerously this move undermines one of the most impactful innovations of this government; Competitive Federalism. While there may be some such thing as India’s capital market, there is no such thing as India’s labour market and 29 Chief Ministers matter more than 1 Prime Minister for massive formal creation. An export labour market like Uttar Pradesh (where thousands migrate to another state everyday) is very different from an import labour market like Kerala (which is now 9.5% Bihari). The centre already sets minimum wages for 45 industries as per Section 2 (a)of the Minimum Wages Act of 1948. An indicative national rate – we currently have a national floor minimum wage level of Rs. 160 that is non-binding on states – is acceptable but the new proposal dangerously takes away state government power to set wage levels for 1679 industries. Why confiscate power from Chief Ministers?
Labour Reform is controversial all over the world; pursuing it caused a youthful Italian Prime Minister to lose his public support, a socialist French Prime Minister to not stand for re-election, and popular Germany Chancellor Angela Merkel’s unpopular opponent for national elections in September has gained traction on his promise to reverse the 2001 Hartz Commission labour market reforms. Labour legislation often protect the old at the expense of the young and trade unions are geriatric but vocal minority that have cleverly positioned job preservation as a form of job creation. And countries often pursue them when they run out of options; the Hartz commission happened because Germany in 2001 was seen as “the sick man of Europe” with an unprecedented process of decentralization of wage bargaining during the 1990s as its only recovery option. , Japan’s two decade coma and lower women labour force participation ensured Shinzo Abe’s three arrows in Japan tackled labour legislation, and the three month old Prime Minister of France Macron did not get punished in elections despite pledging labour reforms because the French finally recognize they are in a job emergency.
India’s job emergency needs overdue labour reforms. Given political optics, we suggest a five year strategy because the 75th year of independence is a good milestone to acknowledge the difference between independence and freedom. Freedom comes from having options and the best vehicle to create options for citizen are formal jobs. The formalization of India driven by GST, demonetization, ease-of-doing business, and much else is making good progress; we added 1 crore new Provident Fund payers and 1.3 crore new ESI payers in the last three years. Why kill this progress and momentum with a policy hack job like a national minimum wage?
Over the last three years the Ministry of Labour has not displayed strategy, stamina or sequencing and unimaginatively equated labour reform with tackling Chapter VB of the Industrial Disputes Act. Its poor performance now make it desperate but it should pursue competition for EPFO (this loots employers by running the world’s most expensive government securities mutual fund and harasses employees with 4 times more dormant accounts than lives one) and ESI (this is India’s most inefficient health insurance with a claims ratio of 45% and Rs 30,000 crore of bank deposits that belong to employees). It should accept moving to a Universal Enterprise Number for Enterprises instead of insisting on a Universal Establishment number to cover for its lack of technology. It should move all returns, challans, registers, licenses, etc online and give India a drop dead date for 100% paperless, presenceless, cashless for 100% of labour legislation.
The National Minimum Wage legislation is baffling because it negates the strategy of using the constitution’s Section 252 (2) used by seven states to amend central labour laws. How can states curate job friendly habitats if a hukumnama from Delhi says that the wages in Mumbai will be the same as Etawah, Kanpur, Kishtwar, or Mysore? The kid we met at the start of this article said he needed four times more money in Mumbai than Gwalior because all the kids who went to Mumbai for Rs 10,000 are back because “Khaana, Rehna or Office jaana nahin banta”. The only way to sustainably raise minimum wages is massive non-farm formal job creation; China has raised minimum wages every quarter for the last four years despite massive increases in productivity (20 people now produce the same GDP that 100 people used to produce in 1990) because of a massive migration to non-farm employment (640 million since 1978).
Legislating high minimum wages is popular with politicians all over the world because voters believe it is a “free lunch”, i.e., it is an inexpensive alternative to higher taxes, has no real costs and helps the poor. But setting high national minimum wages has real costs for India like lower formal employment and sabotaging competitive federalism. But the most toxic consequence of the national minimum wage hukumnama are reserved for our youth; instead of higher wages, their formal wages may be zero. It must be stopped.
This article was published in Business Standard
Working With a Multigenerational Workforce: Benefits and Challenges
Benefits of a multigenerational workforce Each workforce from a different generation has a unique perspective shaped by their experiences, upbringing, and cultural influences; they bring...Read More
Growth of Hospitality Industry in India 2023 and Prospects for 2024
Surging Opportunities and Hiring Trends in 2024 Fueled by a surge in travel, India experienced a remarkable 50% increase in hiring for tourism and hospitality...Read More
Telecom Industry in India: The evolving landscape
Inventory in the Telecom Sector: In the telecom sector, inventory encompasses a range of tangible and intangible assets crucial for operations. This includes physical infrastructure...Read More
Workforce Expansion Strategies: New Hiring and Replacement Plans
Workforce landscape among industries, cities and functions In the dynamic workforce landscape, specific industries are at the forefront, showcasing evolving and strategic approaches in shaping...Read More
Job Market in India in 2024
Tech behemoths putting a stop to hiring? Silicon Valley's responses to economic downturns have impacted India's tech industry, with major companies halting hiring activities due...Read More