India’s prosperity depends on reducing its 50% self-employment

In the 1920s, Russian economist Alexander Chayanov made the case to Pandit Nehru that small farms were viable because of self-exploitation; you don’t have to pay yourself, your wife or your kids a salary. This argument is as dyfunctional and nonsensical today for small farms as it was almost 100 years ago but it also applies to India’s 50% self-employment.

Our massive self-employment is not some overweight entrepreneurial gene among Indians; the poor cannot afford to be unemployed so they are self-employed. I’d like to make the case that: a) India’s huge self-employment is not a feature but a bug because not all entrepreneurship is viable and not everybody can be an entrepreneur; b) Employment is changing globally but there is such a thing as bad self-employment; and c) Policy makers in India should focus on increasing formal wage employment and good self-employment.

India has 63 million enterprises but doesn’t need that many — the US economy is eight times our size but only has 22 million enterprises.

More importantly, 12 million of our enterprises don’t have an address, 12 million work from home, only 7 million were registered for indirect taxes pre-GST, and only 1.2 million pay into mandatory employer social security programme.

This massive informality is not only dangerous for its sense of humour about the rule of law but is painful because of the huge drag on productivity that murder the wage premium and formal wage employment. And we must be careful about positioning the gig economy in the world but this is also the only reconciliation of our 4.9% unemployment with 40% of our labour force being working poor (they make enough money to live but not enough money to pull out of poverty). India does not have a jobs problem but a wage problem and the only way to make self-employment viable is to increase the productivity of our enterprises.

Improving the productivity of our enterprises needs policy to push five things; formalisation, urbanisation, industrialisation, financialisation and human capital.

Formalisation because formal enterprises have access to credit, human capital, technology, etc that give them the productivity to pay the wage premium (the 50% increase in number of registered enterprises post-GST is an important early outcome).

Urbanisation because there is a massive divergence between real and nominal wages in our big cities that is blunting migration (we only have 52 cities with more than a million people compared with China’s 375).

Industrialisation because the only way to help farmers is to have less of them and that needs massive non-farm job creation (50% of our labour force in agriculture only produces 14% of our GDP). Financialisation because financial savings and digital payments create access, credit and track records (the 0.1 million transactions per month on UPI have gone to 126 million this month and will touch a billion in one year). Human capital because enterprises can’t manufacture their own employees and our school, skill and college system is not producing employable output. Enterprises cannot substitute for the state, and the biggest gift to entrepreneurs is a state that does less so it can do more in the areas that make India a fertile habitat for job creation.

Formal, private job creation — as evidenced by Provident Fund and ESI payers — has grown by more than 20 million over the last few years.

These may not be jobs but there are new formal jobs. And recent reforms — demonetisation, GST, RERA, Bankruptcy Act, shell company evisceration, ease of doing business, Aadhaar, UPI, etc —are starting to reinforce each to create an entrepreneurial ecosystem that creates babies (small formal companies that grow) rather than dwarfs (small informal companies that stay small). Economists have often used the words informal, unorganised and small interchangeably.

Informal is illegal but there is nothing wrong with small. India will create many honest, small and formal enterprises over the next decade. Some of these enterprises will be self-employment. Some of them will stay small. But many will grow to offer the productive wage employment that India’s youth need.

Featured in Economic Times


Manish Sabharwal

Exec. Vice Chairman & Co-Founder TeamLease Services Ltd

Latest Blogs

13 Reasons Why Staffing Solutions Can Ease Your HR Woes

Here are 13 reasons why companies should seek staffing solutions: Finding the Right Talent: In India, the country’s working-age population is expected to increase by...

Read More

Powering the Next Wave of Inclusive Growth through Business Correspondents

What types of products and services can be provided by BCs? The roles and responsibilities of BCs can be defined under the contract between the...

Read More

5g Services in India Unlocking Job Growth Potential

In addition to the direct income contributions from these new business sectors, service innovation will be essential to fostering expansion in the connection industry. 5G...

Read More

Quick Commerce: Is this a profitable and sustainable way?

Is this a profitable and sustainable way? The quick commerce trend has primarily accelerated due to its sheer speed, the convenience of ordering, and the...

Read More

Optimistic Employment Outlook for Services Sector this Quarter, Nearly 73% of Employers Intent to Hire

Large firms lead the hiring intent by a significant margin Employers anticipate strong hiring intent across sectors by business size. Small services firms are displaying...

Read More